back to news list
Digital Participation Platforms & AI: Advancing civic engagement for the future of democracy
Aug 25, 2025

Digital Participation Platforms & AI: Advancing civic engagement for the future of democracy

At CollectiveUP, our mission has always been to explore how technology can strengthen civic engagement and support democratic processes. Over the past few years, we have taken a leading role in the analysis and design of Digital Participation Platforms (DPPs). For the EIT Culture & Creativity (EIT C&C) program, we investigated both open-source and proprietary platforms, examining their functionalities, strengths, and emerging AI-powered features.

This work highlighted not only the diversity of tools available but also their increasing sophistication. From participatory budgeting and opinion clustering to sentiment analysis and AI-assisted moderation, these platforms are pushing the boundaries of how institutions and citizens interact


Key findings from our EIT Culture & Creativity research on Digital Participation Platforms (DPPs)

We reviewed a wide range of platforms, some well-established in European cities, others emerging from civic tech movements. Here are a few highlights:

  • CitizenLab: Known for its robust adoption across EU municipalities, it offers AI-driven analytics such as sentiment detection, trend analysis, and topic clustering.
  • Decidim: Open-source, modular, and democratically governed, Decidim powers debates, proposals, assemblies, and budgeting. It is already experimenting with GPT integration and remains one of the most legitimate civic platforms worldwide.
  • Your Priorities: Lightweight and community-driven, it features pro/con voting and AI tools like toxicity detection and simple civic assistants.
  • Pol.is: A unique platform using machine learning for consensus-building, famous for enabling structured debate in high-stakes policy contexts.
  • CONSUL Democracy: One of the largest civic platforms globally, supporting proposals, participatory budgeting, and e-voting at scale.
  • Consento: An innovative platform focusing on privacy-preserving and consent-based participation, especially designed with youth in mind.

Each platform offers a different mix of features, governance models, and integration potential. Importantly, many are increasingly incorporating AI, whether through analytics, summarization, moderation, or translation, indicating a clear trajectory toward smarter, more adaptive civic platforms.

According to our study, the most promising open-source solution is Decidim, due to its democratic governance, modular design, and ongoing integration of AI tools.


Continuing this work: AI in CONIFER

Building on this foundation, we are now deepening our exploration through the CONIFER project, which investigates how AI can further enhance DPPs. We are analyzing how neural networks, natural language processing, and explainable AI can support processes such as consensus-building, transparent debate summarization, and ethical data use.


Looking ahead

Our commitment to advancing democratic digital participation continues. In one of our current Horizon Europe proposals, we have chosen to work with Decidim, underscoring the importance of open-source and democratically governed platforms.

Our vision is clear: to help build the next generation of DPPs, open, transparent, AI-enhanced, and capable of strengthening our democracies.


Comparison matrix of Digital Participation Platforms and AI features

Participation Platforms Table
Platform Key Features Open Source Price AI-Enabled Features Strengths & Notes
CitizenLab Surveys, idea crowdsourcing, budgeting, dashboards No (SaaS) £12,500–£36,500 / year Sentiment & trend analysis, topic clustering Widely used in EU cities, strong analytics, People Powered guide reference
Decidim Proposals, debates, assemblies, budgeting, accountability, API Yes Free (open source) Spam filtering, translation, pilot GPT tools Strong legitimacy, modular, widely deployed
Your Priorities Idea ranking, pro/con voting, commenting Yes Free (open source) Toxicity detection, simple AI bots Lightweight, transparent deliberation, civic-friendly
Pol.is Opinion clustering, interactive vote maps Yes Free (open source) ML-based consensus summaries Unique clustering, high-stakes policy proven, People Powered guide
EngagementHQ (Bang the Table) Surveys, mapping, storytelling, Q&A No (SaaS) $20,000/year + $2,500 onboarding Limited AI Robust consultation tools, People Powered rated highly
CONSUL Democracy Proposals, debates, budgeting, e-voting Yes Free (open source) Basic analytics Large deployments, reliable, used globally
PlaceSpeak Geo-verification, mapping, surveys, forums No (SaaS) From $249.99/month Geospatial analytics Strong neighborhood-level engagement, IAP2-aligned
Maptionnaire Map-based participatory surveys No (SaaS) Varies (contact for pricing) Spatial response clustering Supports urban co-creation, EU project experience
Consento Consent-centered participation, youth-focused Yes Free (open source) Consent flow modeling, explainable AI Ethical-first, minors’ participation, used in EU civic projects
Balancing Act Participatory budgeting interface No (SaaS) Varies None noted Transparent fiscal participation, strong in North America & EU
Discourse Forum architecture, voting, moderation plugins Yes (with paid tiers) From $20/month AI moderation via plugins Highly flexible, strong plugin ecosystem

Soon, we will be publishing a report on the CONIFER website, offering insights into the state of the art in DPPs, AI applications, and recommendations for future development. Join our Newsletter to get informed once it is published. 

→ Partner with CollectiveUP for democracy and participation projects→ Contact Us